RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Upcomers vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

UPCM

Upcomers

EST. 2023

FNDG

Funding Traders

UPCOMERS

METRIC

FUNDING TRADERS

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$25

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

UPCOMERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

Upcomers PROS

+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context for European traders.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

Upcomers CONS

−Founded in 2023, making Upcomers a very new firm with minimal operational track record.
−No profit split, drawdown, funding, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics makes it very difficult for traders to make informed decisions.

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Upcomers

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH UPCM