RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

TradeXprop vs FundedElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TXPR

TradeXprop

EST. 2023

FUNDE2

FundedElite

EST. 2023

TRADEXPROP

METRIC

FUNDEDELITE

58/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE58/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$59—

MIN COST

BETTER$39

3dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

TRADEXPROP DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: cTrader, MT4, MT5

FUNDEDELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader

TradeXprop PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $59 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 3 days is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Overall drawdown of 9% is slightly above average but paired with broad market access including Crypto.
+EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

TradeXprop CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−News trading is not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility for traders.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

FundedElite PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
+On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedElite CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT