RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

TradeXprop vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TradeXprop
TXPR
TradeXprop
EST. 2023
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
TRADEXPROP
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
59/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$59
MIN COST
BETTER$1
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2

TRADEXPROP DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
cTrader, MT4, MT5

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

TradeXprop PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $59 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 3 days is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Overall drawdown of 9% is slightly above average but paired with broad market access including Crypto.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

TradeXprop CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • News trading is not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility for traders.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

TradeXprop
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Lower trust score (59/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

TradeXprop Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy