TX3 Funding vs Goat Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TX3 FUNDING DETAILS

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptional, far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $65 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility for funded traders

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings
−Overall drawdown of 5% is meaningfully below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7

+Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
+Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
+Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
+Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

TX3 Funding

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

Goat Funded Futures

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.