TX3 Funding vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TX3 FUNDING DETAILS

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptional, far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $65 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility for funded traders

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings
−Overall drawdown of 5% is meaningfully below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

TX3 Funding

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

Funded Futures Network

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.