RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trade The Pool vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPL

Trade The Pool

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

TRADE THE POOL

METRIC

SAVIUS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$97BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADE THE POOL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Stocks

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Trade The Pool PROS

+Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
+Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
+Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms

Trade The Pool CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
−No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trade The Pool

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH TTPL