RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Trade The Pool vs RebelsFunding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TTPL
Trade The Pool
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
TRADE THE POOL
METRIC
REBELSFUNDING
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER42/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$320,000
$97—
MIN COST
BETTER$9
—
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
TRADE THE POOL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Stocks
REBELSFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 4-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Trade The Pool PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
- +Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
- +Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
- +Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms
Trade The Pool CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
- −No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days
RebelsFunding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
- +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.
RebelsFunding CONS
- −Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
- −Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy