RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trade The Pool vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPL
Trade The Pool
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
TRADE THE POOL
METRIC
QT FUNDED
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$97
MIN COST
BETTER$12
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

TRADE THE POOL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Stocks

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Trade The Pool PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
  • +Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
  • +Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
  • +Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms

Trade The Pool CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
  • No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trade The Pool
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Trade The Pool Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy