RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Trade The Pool vs MyFlashFunding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TTPL
Trade The Pool
MFFL
MyFlashFunding
TRADE THE POOL
METRIC
MYFLASHFUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$97—
MIN COST
BETTER$15
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADE THE POOL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Stocks
MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, Sway Charts
Trade The Pool PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
- +Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
- +Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
- +Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms
Trade The Pool CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
- −No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days
MyFlashFunding PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.
MyFlashFunding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy