RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trade The Pool vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPL

Trade The Pool

FNDG

Funding Traders

TRADE THE POOL

METRIC

FUNDING TRADERS

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$97—

MIN COST

BETTER$25

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADE THE POOL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Stocks

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

Trade The Pool PROS

+Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
+Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
+Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms

Trade The Pool CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
−No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trade The Pool

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH TTPL