RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trade The Pool vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPL

Trade The Pool

BLGD

Blue Guardian

TRADE THE POOL

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$97

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADE THE POOL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Stocks

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Trade The Pool PROS

+Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
+Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
+Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms

Trade The Pool CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
−No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trade The Pool

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH TTPL