RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trade The Pool vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPL

Trade The Pool

AUDC

Audacity Capital

EST. 2012

TRADE THE POOL

METRIC

AUDACITY CAPITAL

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$97—

MIN COST

BETTER$42

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADE THE POOL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Stocks

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Static
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

Trade The Pool PROS

+Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
+Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
+Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms

Trade The Pool CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
−No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days

Audacity Capital PROS

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
+Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

−Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
−Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trade The Pool

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH TTPL