RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trade The Pool vs ATFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPL
Trade The Pool
ATFD
ATFunded
TRADE THE POOL
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$97
MIN COST
BETTER$49
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

TRADE THE POOL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Stocks

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Trade The Pool PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
  • +Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
  • +Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
  • +Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms

Trade The Pool CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
  • No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trade The Pool
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
ATFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Trade The Pool Full Review →ATFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy