RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Trade The Pool vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TTPL
Trade The Pool
ATFD
ATFunded
TRADE THE POOL
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$97—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADE THE POOL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Stocks
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
Trade The Pool PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
- +Single-step funding process matches the best performers, beating the 1.6-step industry average
- +Max funding of $200,000 provides substantial capital access for stock traders
- +Stock market access offers a distinct asset class not available at many CFD or futures firms
Trade The Pool CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −No profit split data is provided to compare against the industry average of 84.7%
- −No payout timing data is available to compare against the industry average of 6.5 days
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy