RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit Futures vs Lionheart Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
LHFT
Lionheart Funding
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
METRIC
LIONHEART FUNDING
45/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
41/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
1.57/5
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

  • +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
  • Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
  • Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

Lionheart Funding PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

Lionheart Funding CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
  • Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit Futures
Higher trust score (45/100). Faster payouts at —d.
Lionheart Funding
Lower trust score (41/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Futures Full Review →Lionheart Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy