RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit Futures vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTPF

The Trading Pit Futures

BGFT

Blue Guardian Futures

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES

45/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

3.5/5—

RATING

BETTER4.29/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

100%

—

MAX FUNDING

$450,000

—

MIN COST

$84

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

+Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
−Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
−Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

+Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
+Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
−Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
−Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit Futures

Lower trust score (45/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH TTPF