HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
The Trading Pit Futures vs The 5%ers
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | The Trading Pit Futures | The 5%ers ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 45/100 | 67/100BETTER |
| PROFIT SPLIT | — | 100% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | — | 14d |
| PASS RATE | — | 18% |
| MIN COST | — | $39 |
| MAX FUNDING | — | $4,000,000 |
| RATING | 3.5/5 | 4.14/5BETTER |
| REVIEW COUNT | 2 | 5BETTER |
| STEPS | — | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | — | Trailing |
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS
THE 5%ERS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, advanced
The Trading Pit Futures PROS
- +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
The Trading Pit Futures CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
- −Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
The 5%ers PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
- +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
- +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass
The 5%ers CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
- −Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
