RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The Trading Pit vs The Funded Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
TFTR
The Funded Trader
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$600,000
$99BETTER
MIN COST
—$489
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
THE TRADING PIT DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader
THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader
The Trading Pit PROS
- +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures
The Trading Pit CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
The Funded Trader PROS
- +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
- +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
- +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.
The Funded Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
- −Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy