RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
SAVIUS
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$300,000
$99BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Savius
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy