RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs OFP Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTP

The Trading Pit

EST. 2022

OFPF

OFP Funding

EST. 2021

THE TRADING PIT

METRIC

OFP FUNDING

74/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$5,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$99BETTER

MIN COST

—$150

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradingView

The Trading Pit PROS

+Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

OFP Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
+News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit

Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TTP