RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The Trading Pit vs MyFlashFunding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
MFFL
MyFlashFunding
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
MYFLASHFUNDING
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$15
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
THE TRADING PIT DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader
MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, Sway Charts
The Trading Pit PROS
- +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures
The Trading Pit CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
MyFlashFunding PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.
MyFlashFunding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy