RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
FNDF
FundedFast
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
FundedFast
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Full Review →FundedFast Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy