RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
63/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
4.33/5—
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$79
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
—
PASS RATE
—
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit
Lower trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy