RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
BLGD
Blue Guardian
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$99
MIN COST
—
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Blue Guardian
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Full Review →Blue Guardian Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy