RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
THE TRADING PIT
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$5,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
$99
MIN COST
BETTER$42
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (74/100). Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy