PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/The Trading Pit vs Audacity Capital
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

The Trading Pit vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
TRUST SCORE63/100TIE63/100TIE
PROFIT SPLIT80%90%BETTER
PAYOUT DAYS1d0dBETTER
MIN COST$99$42BETTER
MAX FUNDING$5,000,000BETTER$2,000,000
RATING4.33/5BETTER4/5
REVIEW COUNT23BETTER
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNTrailing EODStatic

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (63/100). Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Trading Pit Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy