RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTP

The Trading Pit

EST. 2022

AQFT

AquaFutures

THE TRADING PIT

METRIC

AQUAFUTURES

74/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$5,000,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$99

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

The Trading Pit PROS

+Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

AquaFutures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
+Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
+Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
+The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
−Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
−Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit

Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TTP