RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Trading Pit vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TTP

The Trading Pit

EST. 2022

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

THE TRADING PIT

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

63/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

4.33/5BETTER

RATING

—2.75/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$5,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$99—

MIN COST

BETTER$35

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—8d

—

PASS RATE

31%

2—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

The Trading Pit PROS

+Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Trading Pit

Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TTP