RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

TribeFunded vs The Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TribeFunded
TRIBE
TribeFunded
TFTR
The Funded Trader
TRIBEFUNDED
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
42/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$1,500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$600,000
$20BETTER
MIN COST
$489
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

TRIBEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

TribeFunded PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
  • +Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.

TribeFunded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
  • No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.

The Funded Trader PROS

  • +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
  • +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
  • +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
  • Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

TribeFunded
Higher trust score (42/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
The Funded Trader
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

TribeFunded Full Review →The Funded Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy