RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
TribeFunded vs The Funded Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TRIBE
TribeFunded
TFTR
The Funded Trader
TRIBEFUNDED
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
42/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$600,000
$20BETTER
MIN COST
—$489
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRIBEFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader
TribeFunded PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
- +Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.
TribeFunded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
- −Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
- −No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.
The Funded Trader PROS
- +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
- +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
- +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.
The Funded Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
- −Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy