RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

TribeFunded vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TRIBE

TribeFunded

QT Funded

EST. 2023

TRIBEFUNDED

METRIC

QT FUNDED

42/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER72/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$1,500,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$400,000

$20—

MIN COST

BETTER$12

1dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRIBEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

TribeFunded PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
+Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.

TribeFunded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
−No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

TribeFunded

Lower trust score (42/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

START WITH TRIBE