RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
TribeFunded vs Blue Guardian
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TRIBE
TribeFunded
BLGD
Blue Guardian
TRIBEFUNDED
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
42/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$1,500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$20
MIN COST
—
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRIBEFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
TribeFunded PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
- +Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.
TribeFunded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
- −Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
- −No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy