RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

TribeFunded vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TribeFunded
TRIBE
TribeFunded
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
TRIBEFUNDED
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
42/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER54/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$1,500,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$20
MIN COST
BETTER$1
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

TRIBEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

TribeFunded PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
  • +Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.

TribeFunded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
  • No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

TribeFunded
Lower trust score (42/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

TribeFunded Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy