RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Tradeify vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TRFY

Tradeify

EST. 2022

QT Funded

EST. 2023

TRADEIFY

METRIC

QT FUNDED

53/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER72/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$99—

MIN COST

BETTER$12

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADEIFY DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic, TradingView, Tradovate, WealthCharts
TYPES: futures, fast-payout

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Tradeify PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a larger earnings share
+Min challenge cost of $99 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering faster access to capital
+On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedule firms

Tradeify CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving less room for drawdown
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trading flexibility for position traders

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Tradeify

Lower trust score (53/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH TRFY