RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Tradeify vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TRFY

Tradeify

EST. 2022

ECLT

Eclipse Trading

EST. 2007

TRADEIFY

METRIC

ECLIPSE TRADING

53/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$150,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$99

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADEIFY DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic, TradingView, Tradovate, WealthCharts
TYPES: futures, fast-payout

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Tradeify PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a larger earnings share
+Min challenge cost of $99 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering faster access to capital
+On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedule firms

Tradeify CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving less room for drawdown
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trading flexibility for position traders

Eclipse Trading PROS

+Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
+Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
+Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
+Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

−No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
−Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
−Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Tradeify

Higher trust score (53/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH TRFY