RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Trader Funding vs Funded Futures Network
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TRFD
Trader Funding
FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$250,000
—
MIN COST
$81
—
PAYOUT DAYS
0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower
Trader Funding PROS
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
Trader Funding CONS
- −No data was provided for this firm, making meaningful comparison impossible.
- −Traders cannot assess key metrics such as profit split, drawdown, or funding levels.
- −Lack of data represents a significant transparency concern for prospective traders.
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Futures Network
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy