RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Traddoo vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TRAD

Traddoo

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

TRADDOO

METRIC

SAVIUS

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

3.5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$109BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

3dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TRADDOO DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Traddoo Trading Platform

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Traddoo PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit target of 2% is exceptionally low, making the funded stage far easier to reach.
+On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedules.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

Traddoo CONS

−Drawdown is expressed in dollars ($800), so direct comparison to the percentage-based industry average is not applicable.
−Min challenge cost of $109 is above the industry average of $186.7 — approaching average cost territory.
−Proprietary platform only with no MT4, MT5, or cTrader support, limiting platform familiarity for most traders.

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Traddoo

Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TRAD