RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Traddoo vs Matrix Executions
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TRAD
Traddoo
MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
TRADDOO
METRIC
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$109
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADDOO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Traddoo Trading Platform
MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Traddoo PROS
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Profit target of 2% is exceptionally low, making the funded stage far easier to reach.
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedules.
- +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.
Traddoo CONS
- −Drawdown is expressed in dollars ($800), so direct comparison to the percentage-based industry average is not applicable.
- −Min challenge cost of $109 is above the industry average of $186.7 — approaching average cost territory.
- −Proprietary platform only with no MT4, MT5, or cTrader support, limiting platform familiarity for most traders.
Matrix Executions PROS
- +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
Matrix Executions CONS
- −Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
- −Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy