RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Traddoo vs Kershner Trading Group
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TRAD
Traddoo
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
TRADDOO
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$109
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADDOO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Traddoo Trading Platform
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Traddoo PROS
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Profit target of 2% is exceptionally low, making the funded stage far easier to reach.
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedules.
- +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.
Traddoo CONS
- −Drawdown is expressed in dollars ($800), so direct comparison to the percentage-based industry average is not applicable.
- −Min challenge cost of $109 is above the industry average of $186.7 — approaching average cost territory.
- −Proprietary platform only with no MT4, MT5, or cTrader support, limiting platform familiarity for most traders.
Kershner Trading Group PROS
- +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
- +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
- +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.
Kershner Trading Group CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
- −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
- −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy