RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Take Profit Trader vs QT Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TPTP
Take Profit Trader
EST. 2022
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
TAKE PROFIT TRADER
METRIC
QT FUNDED
48/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$50—
MIN COST
BETTER$12
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TAKE PROFIT TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
QT FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
Take Profit Trader PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
Take Profit Trader CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
QT Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.
QT Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Take Profit Trader
Lower trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy