RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Take Profit Trader vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TPTP

Take Profit Trader

EST. 2022

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

TAKE PROFIT TRADER

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

48/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$250,000

$50BETTER

MIN COST

—$81

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TAKE PROFIT TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, beginner

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

Take Profit Trader PROS

+Min challenge cost of $50 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass

Take Profit Trader CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Take Profit Trader

Higher trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TPTP