HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
Take Profit Trader vs Funded Futures Network
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Take Profit Trader EST. 2022 | Funded Futures Network EST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 60/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 0dTIE | 0dTIE |
| MIN COST | $150 | $135BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000 | $250,000BETTER |
| RATING | 5/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 1BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | EOD Trailing | EOD Trailing |
TAKE PROFIT TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures, CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX
- PLATFORMS
- TradingView, NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Bookmap, MultiCharts, MotiveWave, Trade Navigator, R Trader, VolFix, ATAS, Investor R/T, Quantower, Finamark, Jigsaw Trader
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Onyx, Quantower, EdgeProX, MotiveWave, NinjaTrader
Take Profit Trader PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
Take Profit Trader CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Futures Network
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
