RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Take Profit Trader vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TPTP

Take Profit Trader

EST. 2022

BLGD

Blue Guardian

TAKE PROFIT TRADER

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN

48/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$50

MIN COST

—

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

TAKE PROFIT TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, beginner

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Take Profit Trader PROS

+Min challenge cost of $50 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass

Take Profit Trader CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Take Profit Trader

Higher trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TPTP