Topstep vs Upcomers

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TOPSTEP DETAILS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
+Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

−Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context for European traders.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

−Founded in 2023, making Upcomers a very new firm with minimal operational track record.
−No profit split, drawdown, funding, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics makes it very difficult for traders to make informed decisions.

Topstep

Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

Upcomers

Lower trust score (50/100). Slower payouts at —d.