HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
Topstep vs The Trading Pit
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Topstep ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012 | The Trading Pit EST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 69/100BETTER | 63/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 7d | 1dBETTER |
| PASS RATE | 28% | — |
| MIN COST | $49BETTER | $99 |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000 | $5,000,000BETTER |
| RATING | 3/5 | 4.33/5BETTER |
| REVIEW COUNT | 3BETTER | 2 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing EOD | Trailing EOD |
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
THE TRADING PIT DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
The Trading Pit PROS
- +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures
The Trading Pit CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy