RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Topstep vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
TOPSTEP
METRIC
SAVIUS
66/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
28%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy