RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Topstep vs FXFair
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FXFR
FXFair
TOPSTEP
METRIC
FXFAIR
66/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$49
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
28%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
FXFAIR DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
FXFair PROS
- +Country of operation is listed as Indonesia, indicating a defined operational base.
- +A registered tag suggests some formal industry presence.
- +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
- +Listing on a comparison platform indicates an intent toward transparency.
FXFair CONS
- −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
- −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no comparison to industry averages is possible.
- −Traders cannot assess payout speed, drawdown rules, or profit targets from available data.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy