RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Topstep vs FundedFirm
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FNFM
FundedFirm
TOPSTEP
METRIC
FUNDEDFIRM
66/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$150,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$100,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$549
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
28%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
FundedFirm PROS
- +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation
FundedFirm CONS
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy