RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Topstep vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Topstep
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FNDG
Funding Traders
TOPSTEP
METRIC
FUNDING TRADERS
66/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
60/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
3.5/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$25
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
28%
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, beginner

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

Topstep PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
  • +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

Funding Traders PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
  • +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Topstep
Higher trust score (66/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Funding Traders
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Topstep Full Review →Funding Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy