RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Topstep vs Funded Futures Family

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Topstep
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FFAM
Funded Futures Family
TOPSTEP
METRIC
FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY
66/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
$49
MIN COST
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
28%
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, beginner

FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Topstep PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
  • +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

Funded Futures Family PROS

  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

Funded Futures Family CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for Funded Futures Family, making meaningful comparison impossible.
  • Note: as a futures firm, drawdown is likely expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
  • Traders cannot evaluate profit potential or risk parameters without any disclosed key metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Topstep
Higher trust score (66/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Funded Futures Family
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Topstep Full Review →Funded Futures Family Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy