RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ThinkCapital vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TKCP

ThinkCapital

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

THINKCAPITAL

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

40/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

2/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$2,000,000

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

THINKCAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Indices

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

ThinkCapital PROS

+Offers a diverse range of markets including forex, metals, commodities, crypto, and indices.
+Multi-asset coverage allows traders to diversify strategies across different market conditions.
+Inclusion of crypto alongside traditional markets appeals to a broad range of modern traders.
+Coverage of metals and commodities supports traders using macro or inflation-driven strategies.

ThinkCapital CONS

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Traders cannot assess value or suitability without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ThinkCapital

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH TKCP