RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

The Funded Trader vs DPFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TFTR
The Funded Trader
DPFD
DPFunded
THE FUNDED TRADER
METRIC
DPFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$600,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
$489
MIN COST
BETTER$58
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Commodities, Indices

The Funded Trader PROS

  • +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
  • +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
  • +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
  • Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

DPFunded PROS

  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

The Funded Trader
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.
DPFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

The Funded Trader Full Review →DPFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy