HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
Traders Launch vs Funded Futures Network
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Traders Launch EST. 2023 | Funded Futures Network EST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | — | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 1d | 0dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $49BETTER | $135 |
| MAX FUNDING | $300,000BETTER | $250,000 |
| RATING | — | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 0TIE | 0TIE |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | EOD Trailing | EOD Trailing |
TRADERS LAUNCH DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- TradingView, Volumetrica, Quantower
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Onyx, Quantower, EdgeProX, MotiveWave, NinjaTrader
Traders Launch PROS
- +Daily payout frequency is highly competitive, offering traders faster access to funds than most firms.
- +Days to first payout at 7 is close to the industry average of 6.5, reflecting a reasonable wait time.
- +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
- +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
Traders Launch CONS
- −Very limited data is provided, making full comparison to industry averages impossible across most metrics.
- −Without profit split, funding size, or challenge cost data, overall value cannot be properly assessed.
- −Lack of transparency on drawdown, targets, and steps to funded limits trader decision-making confidence.
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Traders Launch
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Funded Futures Network
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
