RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Traders Launch vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TDLC
Traders Launch
ATFD
ATFunded
TRADERS LAUNCH
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$49
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADERS LAUNCH DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
Traders Launch PROS
- +Daily payout frequency is highly competitive, offering traders faster access to funds than most firms.
- +Days to first payout at 7 is close to the industry average of 6.5, reflecting a reasonable wait time.
- +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
- +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
Traders Launch CONS
- −Very limited data is provided, making full comparison to industry averages impossible across most metrics.
- −Without profit split, funding size, or challenge cost data, overall value cannot be properly assessed.
- −Lack of transparency on drawdown, targets, and steps to funded limits trader decision-making confidence.
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy