RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Traders Launch vs ATFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TDLC
Traders Launch
ATFD
ATFunded
TRADERS LAUNCH
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$49
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

TRADERS LAUNCH DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Traders Launch PROS

  • +Daily payout frequency is highly competitive, offering traders faster access to funds than most firms.
  • +Days to first payout at 7 is close to the industry average of 6.5, reflecting a reasonable wait time.
  • +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
  • +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.

Traders Launch CONS

  • Very limited data is provided, making full comparison to industry averages impossible across most metrics.
  • Without profit split, funding size, or challenge cost data, overall value cannot be properly assessed.
  • Lack of transparency on drawdown, targets, and steps to funded limits trader decision-making confidence.

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Traders Launch
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d.
ATFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Traders Launch Full Review →ATFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy